SB 4.21.30

SB 4.21.30

Devanagari

दौहित्रादीनृते मृत्यो: शोच्यान् धर्मविमोहितान् । वर्गस्वर्गापवर्गाणां प्रायेणैकात्म्यहेतुना ॥ ३० ॥

Verse text

dauhitrādīn ṛte mṛtyoḥ śocyān dharma-vimohitān varga-svargāpavargāṇāṁ prāyeṇaikātmya-hetunā

Synonyms

dauhitra ādīn — grandsons like my father, Vena ; ṛte except ; mṛtyoḥ of personified death ; śocyān abominable ; dharma vimohitān — bewildered on the path of religion ; varga religion, economic development, sense gratification and liberation ; svarga elevation to the heavenly planets ; apavargāṇām being freed from material contamination ; prāyeṇa almost always ; eka one ; ātmya the Supreme Personality of Godhead ; hetunā on account of .

Translation

Although abominable persons like my father, Vena, the grandson of death personified, are bewildered on the path of religion, all the great personalities like those mentioned agree that in this world the only bestower of the benedictions of religion, economic development, sense gratification, liberation or elevation to the heavenly planets is the Supreme Personality of Godhead.

Translation (Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura)

This is also the conclusion of Manu, Uttānapāda, King Dhruva, the saintly king Priyavrata, my grandfather Aṅga, many other great persons, Brahmā, Śiva, Prahlāda and Bali—but not those lamentable persons straying from dharma like Vena. The achievements of artha, dharma, kāma, Svarga and mokṣa are generally given by the independent Supreme Lord, holder of the club. God’s existence is also proved by the experiences of the wise. Svāyambhuva Manu, my paternal grandfather (pituḥ pituḥ) Aṅga, and others got certain achievements by the Supreme Lord’s mercy. Prahlāda and Bali are included, though they appeared after Pṛthu, since they are known from the scriptures. Gaḍa-bhṛtā indicates the Lord holding a club, having a sweet attractive form (not impersonal Brahman). Kṛtyam (achievement) indicates constant service to the Lord’s feet. Others however are deplorable. The son of the daughter of death, Vena, and others, who strayed from dharma, are lamentable. Implied here by Pṛthu is “Let those who disagree with my opinion at this place be sent to the city of my maternal grandfather, death.” The Lord is further described. He is aikātmya, the independent (aikya) svarūpa (ātmya). Ātmya has the same meaning as ātmā. He is the cause, with his independent form, of artha, dharma and kāma (trivarga), Svarga (the result of dharma) and liberation (apavarga). Thus, persons desiring these things should worship the Lord. The Lord is the cause of achievements for persons without desires and for persons with desires. The proof is as follows: akāmaḥ sarva-kāmo vā mokṣa-kāma udāra-dhīḥ | tīvreṇa bhakti-yogena yajeta puruṣaṁ param || The person desiring destruction of all desires, the person with all desires, even the person with the intense desire for liberation, if he has good intelligence, will worship the Supreme Lord with pure bhakti. SB 2.3.10 yat karmabhir yat tapasā jṣāna-vairāgyataś ca yat yogena dāna-dharmeṇa śreyobhir itarair api sarvaṁ mad-bhakti-yogena mad-bhakto labhate 'ṣjasā svargāpavargaṁ mad-dhāma kathaṣcid yadi vāṣchati Everything that can be achieved by karma, penance, jṣāna, vairāgya, mystic yoga, charity, dharma and all other auspicious means of perfecting life is easily achieved by my devotee through bhakti. If somehow or other my devotee desires Svarga, liberation, or residence in my abode, he easily achieves such benedictions. SB 11.20.32.-33 Prāyena (generally) here indicates that sometimes the pure form is mixed with karma or jṣāna. Thus by bhakti mixed with karma and jṣāna results appear. However, the results of trivarga, svarga or liberation do not come from karma or jṣāna but by bhakti alone. This is the meaning. Thus not only the Lord but the bhakti, included in his svarūpa, is also proved.

Purport

King Vena, the father of Pṛthu Mahārāja, was condemned by the brāhmaṇas and saintly persons because of his denying the existence of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and rejecting the method of satisfying Him by performance of Vedic sacrifice. In other words, he was an atheist, who did not believe in the existence of God, and who consequently stopped all Vedic ritualistic ceremonies in his kingdom. Pṛthu Mahārāja considered King Vena’s character abominable because Vena was foolish regarding the execution of religious performances. Atheists are of the opinion that there is no need to accept the authority of the Supreme Personality of Godhead to be successful in religion, economic development, sense gratification or liberation. According to them, dharma, or religious principles, are meant to establish an imaginary God to encourage one to become moral, honest and just so that the social orders may be maintained in peace and tranquillity. Furthermore, they say that actually there is no need to accept God for this purpose, for if one follows the principles of morality and honesty, that is sufficient. Similarly, if one makes nice plans and works very hard for economic development, automatically the result of economic development will come. Similarly, sense gratification also does not depend on the mercy of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, for if one earns enough money by any process, one will have sufficient opportunity for sense gratification. Insofar as liberation is concerned, they say that there is no need to talk of liberation because after death everything is finished. Pṛthu Mahārāja, however, did not accept the authority of such atheists, headed by his father, who was the grandson of death personified. Generally, a daughter inherits the qualities of her father, and a son gets the qualities of his mother. Thus Mṛtyu’s daughter, Sunīthā, got all the qualities of her father, and Vena inherited the qualities of his mother. A person who is always subjected to the rules and regulations of repeated birth and death cannot accommodate anything beyond materialistic ideas. Since King Vena was such a man, he did not believe in the existence of God. Modern civilization agrees with the principles of King Vena, but factually if we scrutinizingly study all the conditions of religion, economic development, sense gratification and liberation, we must accept the principles of the authority of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. According to Vedic literature, religion consists only of the codes of law given by God. If one does not accept the authority of the Supreme Godhead in matters of religion and morality, one must explain why two persons of the same moral standard achieve different results. It is generally found that even if two men have the same moral standards of ethics, honesty and morality, their positions are still not the same. Similarly, in economic development it is seen that if two men work very hard day and night, still the results are not the same. One person may enjoy great opulence without even working, whereas another person, although working very hard, does not even get two sufficient meals a day. Similarly, in the matter of sense gratification, sometimes one who has sufficient food is still not happy in his family affairs or sometimes is not even married, whereas another person, even though not economically well off, has the greatest opportunity for sense gratification. Even an animal like a hog or a dog may have greater opportunities for sense gratification than a human being. Aside from liberation, even if we consider only the preliminary necessities of life — dharma, artha and kāma (religion, economic development and sense gratification) — we will see that they are not the same for everyone. Therefore it must be accepted that there is someone who determines the different standards. In conclusion, not only for liberation must one depend on the Lord, but even for ordinary necessities in this material world. Pṛthu Mahārāja therefore indicated that in spite of having rich parents, children are sometimes not happy. Similarly, in spite of valuable medicine administered by a competent physician, sometimes a patient dies; or in spite of having a big safe boat, sometimes a man drowns. We may thus struggle to counteract impediments offered by material nature, but our attempts cannot be successful unless we are favored by the Supreme Personality of Godhead.